MyInternships.in

Statement and Argument — Questions and Answers

Statement and Argument gives a policy proposal followed by arguments for and against, and asks which are strong. A strong argument is directly relevant, addresses the actual proposal, and rests on substance rather than assertion. Arguments that are trivial, restate the proposal, or rely on vague fear are weak.

10 solved questionsLogical ReasoningFree · no signup

Statement and Argument— Concepts, Formulas & Shortcuts

  • A strong argument is relevant, substantial and addresses the specific proposal.
  • Weak: restating the proposal, appealing to emotion, or offering a trivial objection.
  • "Yes, because it is good" is circular and therefore weak.
  • An argument raising a genuine practical consequence is usually strong.
  • Judge each argument independently before deciding which combination is correct.
  • Real-world plausibility matters here, unlike in statement-and-conclusion questions.

Statement and Argument Practice Questions with Answers

Attempt each question first, then open the explanation. All 10 questions below are free to read and require no signup.

  1. Q1.Statement: Should plastic carry-bags be banned? Argument I: Yes, they choke drains and harm animals. Argument II: No, they are convenient to carry.

    Moderate
    • AOnly I is strong
    • BOnly II is strong
    • CBoth are strong
    • DNeither is strong
    +Show Answer & Explanation

    Answer: A. Only I is strong

    Explanation: I cites concrete environmental harm. Mere convenience is a trivial counterweight to that harm.

    Statement and Argument question 1 of 10
  2. Q2.Statement: Should school examinations be abolished? Argument I: No, exams measure learning and readiness. Argument II: Yes, because students dislike them.

    Moderate
    • AOnly I is strong
    • BOnly II is strong
    • CBoth are strong
    • DNeither is strong
    +Show Answer & Explanation

    Answer: A. Only I is strong

    Explanation: I gives a functional reason. Student dislike alone is not a substantial argument.

    Statement and Argument question 2 of 10
  3. Q3.Statement: Should public transport be made free? Argument I: Yes, it would cut congestion and pollution. Argument II: Yes, because buses are already old.

    Moderate
    • AOnly I is strong
    • BOnly II is strong
    • CBoth are strong
    • DNeither is strong
    +Show Answer & Explanation

    Answer: A. Only I is strong

    Explanation: I names a real public benefit. The age of the buses is unrelated to the fare policy.

    Statement and Argument question 3 of 10
  4. Q4.Statement: Should mobile phones be banned in classrooms? Argument I: Yes, they distract from learning. Argument II: No, because phones are expensive.

    Easy
    • AOnly I is strong
    • BOnly II is strong
    • CBoth are strong
    • DNeither is strong
    +Show Answer & Explanation

    Answer: A. Only I is strong

    Explanation: Distraction bears directly on classroom purpose; cost is irrelevant to whether they should be used in class.

    Statement and Argument question 4 of 10
  5. Q5.Statement: Should India invest more in renewable energy? Argument I: Yes, it reduces import dependence and emissions. Argument II: Yes, because solar panels look modern.

    Easy
    • AOnly I is strong
    • BOnly II is strong
    • CBoth are strong
    • DNeither is strong
    +Show Answer & Explanation

    Answer: A. Only I is strong

    Explanation: I gives economic and environmental substance; appearance is trivial.

    Statement and Argument question 5 of 10
  6. Q6.Statement: Should working hours be reduced to four days a week? Argument I: Yes, trials show equal output with better wellbeing. Argument II: No, because change is difficult.

    Moderate
    • AOnly I is strong
    • BOnly II is strong
    • CBoth are strong
    • DNeither is strong
    +Show Answer & Explanation

    Answer: A. Only I is strong

    Explanation: I cites evidence. "Change is difficult" is a vague objection that applies to any proposal.

    Statement and Argument question 6 of 10
  7. Q7.Statement: Should private cars be restricted in city centres? Argument I: Yes, it would reduce congestion and improve air quality. Argument II: No, it would inconvenience some drivers.

    Moderate
    • AOnly I is strong
    • BOnly II is strong
    • CBoth are strong
    • DNeither is strong
    +Show Answer & Explanation

    Answer: A. Only I is strong

    Explanation: I identifies a broad public benefit; inconvenience to a subset is comparatively minor.

    Statement and Argument question 7 of 10
  8. Q8.Statement: Should coding be taught from primary school? Argument I: Yes, early exposure builds logical thinking. Argument II: No, because computers consume electricity.

    Easy
    • AOnly I is strong
    • BOnly II is strong
    • CBoth are strong
    • DNeither is strong
    +Show Answer & Explanation

    Answer: A. Only I is strong

    Explanation: I addresses educational value. Electricity consumption is an irrelevant objection.

    Statement and Argument question 8 of 10
  9. Q9.Statement: Should companies allow unlimited leave? Argument I: No, it can disrupt project delivery without safeguards. Argument II: Yes, because employees would be happy.

    Difficult
    • AOnly I is strong
    • BOnly II is strong
    • CBoth are strong
    • DNeither is strong
    +Show Answer & Explanation

    Answer: A. Only I is strong

    Explanation: I raises a concrete operational risk; employee happiness alone is too thin to settle the policy.

    Statement and Argument question 9 of 10
  10. Q10.Statement: Should voting be made compulsory? Argument I: Yes, it would raise participation and legitimacy. Argument II: Yes, because voting is a right.

    Difficult
    • AOnly I is strong
    • BOnly II is strong
    • CBoth are strong
    • DNeither is strong
    +Show Answer & Explanation

    Answer: A. Only I is strong

    Explanation: I gives an outcome-based reason. Calling voting a right actually argues against compelling it, so II is weak.

    Statement and Argument question 10 of 10

Statement and Argument — Frequently Asked Questions

How is this different from statement and conclusion?+

Conclusion questions ask what strictly follows from the statement. Argument questions ask you to evaluate the quality of reasoning for or against a proposal, where relevance and substance decide.

What makes an argument weak?+

Irrelevance, triviality, circularity, or reliance on unsupported fear. An argument that merely repeats the proposal in other words adds nothing.

Cleared the aptitude round? Now grab the role.

Preparation only pays off when you apply. Thousands of internships and fresher jobs across India are live on MyInternships.in right now — free to apply, no consultancy fees.