MyInternships.in

Analysing Arguments — Questions and Answers

Analysing Arguments asks you to judge whether a given reason genuinely supports or weakens a claim. A strong argument is directly relevant, addresses the actual claim, and does not rest on an unstated leap. Vague appeals to popularity, tradition or emotion are weak however persuasive they sound.

10 solved questionsLogical ReasoningFree · no signup

Analysing Arguments— Concepts, Formulas & Shortcuts

  • A strong argument is directly relevant to the specific claim being made.
  • Appeals to popularity, tradition, authority or emotion are weak by themselves.
  • To weaken an argument, attack its assumption or offer an alternative explanation.
  • To strengthen it, rule out the main alternative explanation.
  • Statistical evidence beats anecdote, but only if the sample actually fits the claim.
  • An argument that shifts to a different question is irrelevant, not strong.

Analysing Arguments Practice Questions with Answers

Attempt each question first, then open the explanation. All 10 questions below are free to read and require no signup.

  1. Q1.Claim: Cities should expand public transport. Which is the STRONGEST supporting argument?

    Easy
    • ABuses are colourful
    • BPublic transport reduces congestion and per-passenger emissions
    • COther countries have trains
    • DPeople like travelling
    +Show Answer & Explanation

    Answer: B. Public transport reduces congestion and per-passenger emissions

    Explanation: It states a concrete, relevant benefit directly connected to the claim.

    Analysing Arguments question 1 of 10
  2. Q2.Claim: Schools should teach financial literacy. Which is the WEAKEST argument?

    Moderate
    • AStudents face loans and taxes as adults
    • BEarly habits shape lifelong money behaviour
    • CIt has never been taught before, so it should not be
    • DFinancial mistakes are costly and avoidable
    +Show Answer & Explanation

    Answer: C. It has never been taught before, so it should not be

    Explanation: Appealing to tradition gives no reason why the subject should not be taught.

    Analysing Arguments question 2 of 10
  3. Q3.Argument: Sales rose after the new logo launched, so the logo caused the rise. Which best WEAKENS this?

    Difficult
    • AThe logo is attractive
    • BA major competitor shut down in the same month
    • CCustomers noticed the logo
    • DThe logo cost money to design
    +Show Answer & Explanation

    Answer: B. A major competitor shut down in the same month

    Explanation: It supplies an alternative explanation for the sales rise, breaking the causal claim.

    Analysing Arguments question 3 of 10
  4. Q4.Claim: Helmets should be compulsory for two-wheeler riders. Which is the STRONGEST supporting argument?

    Easy
    • AHelmets are widely available
    • BHead injuries fall sharply where helmet laws are enforced
    • CHelmets look sporty
    • DMany riders already own one
    +Show Answer & Explanation

    Answer: B. Head injuries fall sharply where helmet laws are enforced

    Explanation: It presents outcome evidence tied directly to the proposed measure.

    Analysing Arguments question 4 of 10
  5. Q5.Argument: Everyone in my office uses this software, so it must be the best. This reasoning is:

    Moderate
    • AStrong, because many people use it
    • BWeak, because popularity does not establish quality
    • CStrong, because offices are careful
    • DWeak, because software changes
    +Show Answer & Explanation

    Answer: B. Weak, because popularity does not establish quality

    Explanation: It is an appeal to popularity, which says nothing about the product's merit.

    Analysing Arguments question 5 of 10
  6. Q6.Claim: Remote work improves productivity. Which best STRENGTHENS it?

    Moderate
    • AEmployees prefer working from home
    • BMeasured output per employee rose 18% after the shift to remote work
    • COffices are expensive
    • DCommuting is tiring
    +Show Answer & Explanation

    Answer: B. Measured output per employee rose 18% after the shift to remote work

    Explanation: It provides a direct, quantified measure of the very outcome claimed.

    Analysing Arguments question 6 of 10
  7. Q7.Argument: This medicine is safe because it is made from natural ingredients. This reasoning is:

    Moderate
    • AStrong, since natural means safe
    • BWeak, since natural substances can also be harmful
    • CStrong, since it is traditional
    • DWeak, since medicines are expensive
    +Show Answer & Explanation

    Answer: B. Weak, since natural substances can also be harmful

    Explanation: The argument assumes natural implies safe, which is false — many natural substances are toxic.

    Analysing Arguments question 7 of 10
  8. Q8.Claim: The city should build more parks. Which argument is IRRELEVANT?

    Easy
    • AGreen spaces improve air quality
    • BParks provide exercise space
    • CThe mayor enjoys gardening
    • DParks reduce urban heat
    +Show Answer & Explanation

    Answer: C. The mayor enjoys gardening

    Explanation: The mayor's personal hobby has no bearing on whether the city needs parks.

    Analysing Arguments question 8 of 10
  9. Q9.Argument: Students who eat breakfast score higher, so breakfast improves scores. The main weakness is:

    Difficult
    • ABreakfast is cheap
    • BCorrelation is being treated as causation
    • CScores vary by subject
    • DNot all students eat breakfast
    +Show Answer & Explanation

    Answer: B. Correlation is being treated as causation

    Explanation: Households that provide breakfast may differ in other ways that also affect scores, so the causal link is not established.

    Analysing Arguments question 9 of 10
  10. Q10.To weaken an argument most effectively, you should:

    Moderate
    • ARestate the conclusion
    • BAttack the assumption connecting evidence to conclusion
    • CAgree with the evidence
    • DChange the subject
    +Show Answer & Explanation

    Answer: B. Attack the assumption connecting evidence to conclusion

    Explanation: An argument stands on its assumption; undermining that link collapses the inference.

    Analysing Arguments question 10 of 10

Analysing Arguments — Frequently Asked Questions

What makes an argument strong in these questions?+

Direct relevance to the claim plus evidence that does not depend on an unstated assumption. "It has always been done this way" is weak; "a controlled trial showed a 40% improvement" is strong.

How do I weaken an argument most effectively?+

Provide an alternative explanation for the same evidence, or show that the assumption connecting the evidence to the conclusion is false.

Are emotional appeals ever strong?+

Not as logical support. They may persuade, but in argument-evaluation questions relevance and evidence decide the answer.

Cleared the aptitude round? Now grab the role.

Preparation only pays off when you apply. Thousands of internships and fresher jobs across India are live on MyInternships.in right now — free to apply, no consultancy fees.